Buy Chocolate

For more on recettes faciles de desserts au chocolat faire la maison, check out our guide.

I’ve tried more sugar-free chocolate spreads than I care to count, and most of them are terrible. The problem is structural: sugar provides sweetness, texture, browning, and mouthfeel, and replacing it is not as simple as swapping one ingredient for another. Sugar alcohols make spreads gritty. Artificial sweeteners leave chemical aftertastes. Natural alternatives like stevia amplify the bitterness of cocoa in unpleasant ways. But here’s the good news: after a long slog through disappointing jars, I found three store-bought sugar-free spreads and one homemade recipe that genuinely deliver. No asterisks, no “good for a sugar-free option” qualifiers — just good chocolate spread that happens to contain no sugar.

This guide covers the brands worth your money, the sweeteners they use, and how each one performs on taste, texture, and value. I’ve also included a homemade recipe for anyone who wants full control over the sugar-free sweetener choice.

The Sweetener Problem in Sugar-Free Spreads

Every sugar-free spread has to solve the same problem: provide sweetness without sugar. The solutions fall into three categories. Sugar alcohols (maltitol, erythritol, xylitol) provide bulk and sweetness but can cause digestive discomfort and leave a cooling sensation in the mouth. Maltitol is the worst offender — it has a glycemic index of 35 (compared to sugar’s 65), which means it raises blood sugar almost half as much as regular sugar. If you see maltitol on the label, you’re not buying a sugar-free product, you’re buying a slightly less bad sugar product.

Monk fruit and allulose are the two sweeteners that work well in chocolate spreads. Monk fruit is intensely sweet (150–200 times sweeter than sugar) and has no impact on blood glucose. Allulose is a rare sugar that occurs naturally in figs and raisins; it tastes almost identical to sugar but passes through the body without being metabolised. Spreads using these sweeteners tend to taste cleaner and cause fewer digestive issues. Stevia is a distant third option — it works in some formulations but the bitter aftertaste is hard to mask, especially with cocoa’s natural bitterness.

I’ll be direct: if a sugar-free spread uses maltitol as its primary sweetener, I wouldn’t buy it. The digestive side effects are unpleasant, the blood sugar impact is meaningful, and better options exist at comparable prices.

ChocZero Hazelnut Spread — The Best Overall Sugar-Free Option

ChocZero uses monk fruit as its sweetener and soluble corn fibre for texture. The net carb count is 1g per serving with zero added sugar. The ingredient list is: cocoa butter, hazelnuts, soluble corn fibre, sunflower lecithin, monk fruit extract, sea salt. Hazelnuts are the second ingredient after cocoa butter, which is a strong sign — most sugar-free spreads cheap out on the nut content.

The taste is genuinely good. It’s less sweet than Nutella — significantly less — but the sweetness level is appropriate for the dark chocolate flavour profile. The texture is thicker than sugar-based spreads, almost like a soft fudge, which means it doesn’t spread as easily straight from the cupboard. Letting it sit at room temperature for 10–15 minutes solves this. At $12 per 255g jar, it’s expensive, but it’s the most reliable sugar-free option on the market. See how it compares to other options in our best chocolate spread brands ranking.

One thing to note: ChocZero uses soluble corn fibre as a bulking agent, which can cause gas and bloating in sensitive individuals. I don’t experience this, but I’ve heard from readers who do. Start with a small amount to see how your digestive system handles it.

When using sugar-free spreads in recipes, you need to adjust your expectations. Sugar-free spreads don’t caramelise the same way sugar-based ones do in baking — the sweeteners won’t brown or develop the same depth of flavour. I learned this the hard way when my first batch of sugar-free brownies came out pale and underwhelming. The solution is to use a combination of sugar-free spread and a small amount of allulose, which does caramelise to some degree when baked at high temperatures. Start with 375°F (190°C) and watch closely for colour development.

fibre as a bulking agent, which can cause gas and bloating in sensitive individuals. I don’t experience this, but I’ve heard from readers who do. Start with a small amount to see how your digestive system handles it.

Lakanto Chocolate Hazelnut Spread — The Runner-Up

Lakanto uses monk fruit and erythritol as its sweetener blend. The erythritol provides bulk that monk fruit alone can’t deliver, which gives the spread a more familiar texture than ChocZero’s fibre-based approach. The ingredient list is: hazelnuts, erythritol, cocoa, sunflower oil, monk fruit extract, sunflower lecithin, salt. Hazelnuts are the first ingredient, which is an advantage over most competitors.

The taste is slightly sweeter than ChocZero, which some people prefer. The erythritol does produce a mild cooling sensation on the tongue — a known effect of that sweetener — but it’s less noticeable when combined with chocolate than in pure erythritol products. At $10 per 260g jar, it’s competitively priced for the sugar-free category. Available at Whole Foods, online, and increasingly in mainstream grocery stores.

Lakanto’s main drawback is the texture. It’s grainier than ChocZero because erythritol doesn’t dissolve as smoothly as monk fruit. Some people don’t notice this. I do, and it’s why I rank ChocZero slightly higher despite the price difference. For keto-friendly recipes where texture is less critical — like fat bombs or stirred into yoghurt — Lakanto works perfectly. For our full keto recipe collection, see keto chocolate spread recipes.

Besti Chocolate Hazelnut Spread — The New Contender

Besti is a newer entrant in the sugar-free spread market, and it’s worth watching. The brand uses allulose as its primary sweetener — the same rare sugar used in some premium keto products — and the result is the closest taste to sugar-based spread I’ve found in a sugar-free product. The ingredient list is: hazelnuts, allulose, organic cocoa, coconut oil, sunflower lecithin, sea salt, vitamin E (for freshness).

The texture is smoother than both ChocZero and Lakanto, which I attribute to allulose’s ability to dissolve more completely than erythritol or soluble corn fibre. The sweetness level is moderate — somewhere between ChocZero and Lakanto — and there’s no cooling sensation or bitter aftertaste. At $13 per 260g jar, it’s the most expensive option, but the allulose content justifies the premium. Currently available on Amazon and through Besti’s website with limited retail distribution.

Homemade Sugar-Free Chocolate Spread

Making your own sugar-free spread gives you complete control over the sweetener and costs roughly half the price of store-bought options. The base recipe from our homemade chocolate spread guide adapts easily: substitute the maple syrup with 40g of powdered allulose or monk fruit sweetener. The rest of the recipe — hazelnuts, cocoa powder, coconut oil, vanilla, salt — stays the same.

The key adjustment is the sweetener form. Liquid sweeteners (like maple syrup or honey) provide moisture that helps the spread come together. Powdered sugar substitutes don’t. You’ll need to add an extra tablespoon of coconut oil to compensate for the missing moisture. Process the hazelnuts into butter as usual, then add the powdered sweetener and extra oil. The result is a spread that tastes cleaner than most store-bought keto options because you control the sweetener ratio.

If you use allulose, the spread will be slightly softer than one made with erythritol. If you use monk fruit powder, start with 30g and adjust upward — monk fruit is intensely sweet and a little goes a long way. The homemade version keeps for two weeks in the fridge and costs about $6 per 300g batch, making it the most cost-effective option by a significant margin.

The Verdict on Store-Bought vs Homemade

If convenience matters most, buy ChocZero. It’s the most tested and widely available sugar-free spread, and the monk fruit sweetener produces a clean taste that most people enjoy. If texture matters most, try Besti — the allulose base delivers the smoothest sugar-free spread I’ve found. If you want to save money, make your own. The homemade version requires a food processor and 25 minutes of active time, but the per-jar savings add up quickly if you use sugar-free spread regularly.

I’ll also add that the sugar-free spread market is still evolving rapidly. In 2024, there were roughly eight sugar-free chocolate spreads available in the US market. In 2026, that number is closer to twenty. The quality has improved alongside the quantity — early formulations were grainy, chemical-tasting, and overpriced. Current formulations are genuinely competitive with sugar-based spreads in most categories. If you tried sugar-free spread two or three years ago and didn’t like it, the current options are worth a second chance.

I keep a jar of ChocZero in the pantry for mornings when I don’t have time to make my own. The rest of the time, I make a batch of homemade allulose spread on Sunday and it lasts the week. Is it better than real sugar spread? No — nothing I’ve tasted replicates the exact mouthfeel and sweetness of sugar-based chocolate spread. But it’s good enough that I don’t feel like I’m compromising, and for most purposes, that’s the standard that matters. For a full comparison of all chocolate spread categories, visit the buy chocolate homepage.

Chocolate Hazelnut Spread Guide